Does Market Transparency Matter? a Case Study
Antonio Scalia () and
Valerio Vacca ()
No 359, Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) from Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area
We analyse a change in the degree of transparency of MTS, the electronic inter-dealer market for Italian Government bonds, namely the July 1997 move to the anonymity of quotes. Our evidence supports the hypothesis that a decrease in transparency makes liquidity traders worse-off, whereas large/informed traders find it less costly to execute block trades. The evidence is also consistent with the ï¿½waiting gameï¿½ hypothesis of Foster and Viswanathan (1996): under anonymity, traders tend to delay their trades in an attempt to acquire information through the order flow. From a public welfare perspective, our results indicate that the move to anonymity has been accompanied by an increase in market liquidity and by a reduction in volatility, a phenomenon that is also partly explained by the growth in Italyï¿½s prospects for early participation in the EMU. The speed of information aggregation on MTS increases, as shown by an improvement of the MTS lead over the futures market. In a European perspective, the current organisation and performance of MTS place the market in a competitive position with respect to other sovereign bond markets and may contribute to their integration under the single currency.
Keywords: Electronic trading; market efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/temi-disc ... -0359/tema_359it.pdf (application/pdf)
Chapter: Does market transparency matter? A case study (2001)
Chapter: Does Market Transparency Matter? A Case Study (1999)
Working Paper: Does Market Transparency Matter? A Case Study (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_359_99
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) from Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().