Logging Concessions, Certification & Protected Areas in the Peruvian Amazon: Forest Impacts from Combinations of Development Rights & Land-use Restrictions
Loucks Colby J.,
Swenson Jennifer and
No 2018-11, Working Papers from Banco de México
In this paper, we use geospatial data and difference-in-differences models to identify the deforestation effects, during 2000-2013, of the leading forest policies in the Peruvian Amazon: i) logging concessions, ii) third-party certification of concessions, and iii) Protected Areas (PAs). We find that on average logging concessions have no effect on tree-cover loss, while the PAs do reduce loss. Further, the PAs allowing limited private extraction save more forest than do more restrictive PAs. Certification has an impact (reduces loss) only in the single region where concessions reduce loss, suggesting a complementarity of third parties with private and public efforts to govern concessions. Our results suggest roles for private rights within conservation, given oversight.
Keywords: certification; FSC; deforestation; concessions; protected areas; impact evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q23 Q56 Q24 O13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.banxico.org.mx/publications-and-press/b ... -CA8C974B184E%7D.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bdm:wpaper:2018-11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Banco de México Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dirección de Sistemas ().