 The Geography of Consumption and Local Economic Shocks: The Case of the Great RecessionBEA Working Papers from Bureau of Economic Analysis Abstract: Geographic analysis of consumption is often constrained by geographic borders such as counties, but economic agents often cross borders to consume. Using unique card transaction data, we estimate across-county spending flows between firms and consumers for every county in the United States and for 15 industries to provide a new consumption-link across counties that has not been previously studied. To demonstrate the importance of this consumption link, we reexamine the 2007–2009 Great Recession following the work of Mian and Sufi (2013) and Mian, Rao, and Sufi (2014), who demonstrate that counties with the greatest decline in housing net worth also had the largest declines in consumption and employment. We show that the effect of the housing wealth decline crosses borders to affect consumption and employment in a pattern consistent with our spending flows, even for the non-tradable sector. We find that not accounting for cross-border effects tends to understate the impact of local housing wealth shocks on employment and spending by 26 and 17 percent, respectively; it also misallocates where those effects are occurring, by about 11 percent for both spending and employment. JEL-codes: E20 E24 R12 R20 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bea:wpaper:0179 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in BEA Working Papers from Bureau of Economic Analysis Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.