 Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in ActionTom Baker
University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers from University of Connecticut School of Law Abstract: This manuscript reports the results of a qualitative study of personal injury lawyers in Connecticut. Building on the results of an earlier study of lawyers in Florida (Transforming Punishment Into Compensation: In the Shadow of Punitive Damages, 1998 WIS. L. REV. 211), the study describes and explores the implications of professional norms and practices that govern tort settlement behavior. In particular, the study explores the moral and practical barriers to collecting "blood money" (money from individual defendants, as opposed to liability insurance companies), as well as explanations for victims' apparent ability to partially trump the claims of subrogating workers compensation and health insurance carriers. The results pose a challenge to the conventional understanding that tort law in action is a simpler, more streamlined version of tort law on the books. In addition, the results suggest that compensation and retribution figures far more prominently in tort law in action than the deterrence emphasized in much of the theoretical and doctrinal literature. New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:conlaw:uconn_ucwps-1005 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers from University of Connecticut School of Law |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.