Justice and the Outsider: Jurisdiction Over Non-Members in Tribal Legal Systems

Bethany Berger
Additional contact information
Bethany Berger: University of Connecticut

University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers from University of Connecticut School of Law

Abstract: A quarter of a century ago, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe holding that tribes had no criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians. Since that time, the Court has progressively limited tribal criminal, civil, and regulatory jurisdiction over those that are not enrolled members of the tribe. While the decisions have a veneer of history and precedent, their legal basis is extremely thinso much so that Justice O'Connor called a 2001 decision "unmoored from our precedents." This trend is one of the most important developments in Indian law. It is the focus of sustained attention by scholars, tribes, attorneys, and legislators. A decision regarding criminal jurisdiction over nonmember Indians spurred a congressional reversal in 1991, and the Supreme Court has just heard arguments in a case addressing the nature of this legislative action. Congress, moreover, is debating a broader legislative fix as to civil jurisdiction.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=uconn/ucwps (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:conlaw:uconn_ucwps-1015

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers from University of Connecticut School of Law
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().