Third Party Contingency contracts in settlement and litigation
Roland Kirstein and
Neil Rickman
No 2002-1-1038, German Working Papers in Law and Economics from Berkeley Electronic Press
Abstract:
We present, for the first time, a model of recent institutional developments in litigation funding across several European jurisdictions. Recognizing the financing constraints that British cost rules may impose on litigants, these new contractual arrangements combine contingency fees with third party cover for cost in the event of losing the case: we call these “Third Party Contingency” (TPC) contracts. Signing a TPC contract can make filing a suit credible and may increase settlement amounts. This does not, however, increase the likelihood of going to trial, since TPC contracts are only of mutual benefit to the plaintiff and the third party when the case settles out of court. We also find that the mere availability of TPCs may generate the above strategic effect.
Keywords: Contingent fees; British cost allocation rule; Legal Cost Insurance; strategic moves. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C7 G22 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: oai:bepress:
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=gwp (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: "Third Party Contingency" Contracts in Settlement and Litigation (2004) 
Working Paper: "Third Party Contingency" contracts in settlement and litigation (2002) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:dewple:2002-1-1038
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in German Working Papers in Law and Economics from Berkeley Electronic Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().