Model Choice in Multi-City Time Series Studies of Air Pollution and Mortality

Roger Peng, Francesca Dominici and Thomas Louis
Additional contact information
Roger Peng: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics
Francesca Dominici: The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics
Thomas Louis: Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics

No 1055, Johns Hopkins University Dept. of Biostatistics Working Paper Series from Berkeley Electronic Press

Abstract: Multi-city time series studies of particulate matter (PM) and mortality and morbidity have provided evidence that daily variation in air pollution levels is associated with daily variation in mortality counts. These findings served as key epidemiological evidence for the recent review of the United States National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM. As a result, methodological issues concerning time series analysis of the relation between air pollution and health have attracted the attention of the scientific community. Critics have raised concerns about the adequacy of current model formulations. Time series data on pollution and mortality are generally analyzed using log-linear, Poisson regression models for overdispersed counts with the daily number of deaths as outcome, the (possibly lagged) daily level of pollution as a linear predictor, and smooth functions of weather variables and calendar time used to adjust for time-varying confounders. Investigators around the world have used different approaches to adjust for confounding, making it difficult to compare results across studies. To date, the statistical properties of these different approaches have not been comprehensively compared. To address these issues, we quantify and characterize model uncertainty and model choice in adjusting for seasonal and long-term trends in time series models of air pollution and mortality. First,we conduct a simulation study to compare and describe the properties of statistical methods commonly used for confounding adjustment. We generate data under several confounding scenarios and systematically compare the performance of the different methods with respect to the mean squared error of the estimated air pollution coefficient. Second, we apply and compare the modelling approaches to the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS) database which is comprised of daily time series of several pollutants, weather variables, and mortality counts covering the period 1987--2000 for the largest 100 cities in the United States. We find that the NMMAPS estimates for the national average effect of PM(10) at lag 1 on mortality are robust to the different strategies for adjusting for seasonal and long-term trends.

Keywords: Air pollution; Time series; Log-linear regression; Semi-parametric regression; Mortality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-09-03
Note: oai:bepress.com:jhubiostat-1055
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1055&context=jhubiostat (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:jhubio:1055

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Johns Hopkins University Dept. of Biostatistics Working Paper Series from Berkeley Electronic Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().