EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Ozone and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Time-Series Studies and Comparison to a Multi-City Study (The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study)

Michelle Bell, Jonathan Samet and Francesca Dominici
Additional contact information
Michelle Bell: Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
Jonathan Samet: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
Francesca Dominici: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics

No 1057, Johns Hopkins University Dept. of Biostatistics Working Paper Series from Berkeley Electronic Press

Abstract: While many time-series studies of ozone and daily mortality identified positive associations,others yielded null or inconclusive results. We performed a meta-analysis of 144 effect estimates from 39 time-series studies, and estimated pooled effects by lags, age groups,cause-specific mortality, and concentration metrics. We compared results to estimates from the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS), a time-series study of 95 large U.S. cities from 1987 to 2000. Both meta-analysis and NMMAPS results provided strong evidence of a short-term association between ozone and mortality, with larger effects for cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, the elderly, and current day ozone exposure as compared to other single day lags. In both analyses, results were not sensitive to adjustment for particulate matter and model specifications. In the meta-analysis we found that a 10 ppb increase in daily ozone is associated with a 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.53, 1.12%) increase in total mortality, whereas the corresponding NMMAPS estimate is 0.25%(0.12, 0.39%). Meta-analysis results were consistently larger than those from NMMAPS,indicating publication bias. Additional publication bias is evident regarding the choice of lags in time-series studies, and the larger heterogeneity in posterior city-specific estimates in the meta-analysis, as compared with NMAMPS.

Date: 2004-09-10
Note: oai:bepress.com:jhubiostat-1057
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1057&context=jhubiostat (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:jhubio:1057

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Johns Hopkins University Dept. of Biostatistics Working Paper Series from Berkeley Electronic Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bep:jhubio:1057