A Career Choice Critique of Legal Ethics Theory

Andrew Perlman
Additional contact information
Andrew Perlman: Suffolk University Law School

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Publications from Suffolk University Law School

Abstract: The article contends that legal ethics theory would benefit from incorporating an oft-overlooked reality of modern law practice: career choices often predetermine the clients that lawyers represent and the legal strategies that attorneys pursue. The problem with many existing ethics models is that they incorrectly assume that lawyers have sufficient autonomy to select their clients and legal strategies. In fact, most types of law practice place such significant restrictions on lawyers' freedom that career choices provide many attorneys with their main source of discretion. The article suggests that, in light of these client selection and strategy choice constraints, theorists need to explore the ethical dimensions of career choices but have repeatedly failed to do so. The piece ultimately suggests several ways in which existing models can incorporate the important constraining effects of career decisions and how they can consequently offer a richer vision of legal ethics.

Keywords: Legal Ethics; Professional Responsibility; Client Selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=suffolk/fp (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:suffac:suffolk_fp-1022

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Suffolk University Law School Faculty Publications from Suffolk University Law School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().