Evidence Tampering
Chris Sanchirico
Scholarship at Penn Law from University of Pennsylvania Law School
Abstract:
Current writing on evidence tampering - inclusive of the destruction, fabrication, and suppression of evidence - creates the impression that our system of litigation is in a state of fundamental disrepair. This article suggests that this perception may merely reflect defects in the conventional view of trial's purpose. The conventional view sees trial as a standalone device for uncovering micro-historical truths about what has already come to pass. In contrast, this article advocates viewing trial as but one component of the overall mechanism by which the legal system influences everyday behavior. When trial is viewed less in terms of discerning past events, and more in terms of shaping future events, several apparently troublesome aspects of the existing system gain substantial justification, and the way is paved for a more fruitful evaluation of current doctrine.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://lsr.nellco.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=upenn/wps (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:upennl:upenn_wps-1011
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Scholarship at Penn Law from University of Pennsylvania Law School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().