Masking Redistribution (or its Absence)

Jonathan Baron and Edward McCaffery
Additional contact information
Edward McCaffery: USC and Caltech

No usclwps-1000, University of Southern California Legal Working Paper Series from University of Southern California Law School

Abstract: Research has shown that people vary widely in their support or opposition to progressive taxation. We argue here that the perception of progressiveness itself is affected by the nature of the tax system and by the way it is framed, or presented. Experiments conducted over the World-Wide Web and using within-subject design demonstrate that subjects suffer from a range of heuristics and biases in understanding and supporting progressive or redistributive taxation. After reviewing some prior results, we report three new studies. Two of them indicate that people do not sufficiently appreciate the reduction of progressiveness that results from the use of tax deductions to partly reimburse private expenditures. The third indicates that people do not fully appreciate the reduction in progressiveness that results from cuts in government services.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=usclwps (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bep:usclwp:usclwps-1000

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in University of Southern California Legal Working Paper Series from University of Southern California Law School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().