Dirty Money: Is there a Wage Premium for Working in a Pollution Intensive Industry
Matthew Cole (),
Robert Elliott () and
Joanne Lindley ()
Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of Birmingham
Within a compensating wage differential framework we investigate whether there is a wage premium for working in a pollution intensive industry. Our results for the economy as a whole suggest a small wage premium of approximately one quarter of one percent associated with the risk of working in a dirty job. This premium rises to over fifteen percent for those individuals who work in one of the five dirtiest industries. We also find evidence of a fatal risk wage premium, providing estimates of the value of a statistical life of between £12 million and £19 million (2000 prices).
Keywords: Compensating Wage Differentials; Pollution; Value of Statistical Life (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J28 J31 Q52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-lab
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Dirty money: Is there a wage premium for working in a pollution intensive industry? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bir:birmec:09-13
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of Birmingham Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oleksandr Talavera ().