Condorcet vs. Borda in Light of a Dual Majoritarian Approach

Eyal Baharad and Shmuel Nitzan
Additional contact information
Eyal Baharad: University of Haifa

No 2010-07, Working Papers from Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Many voting rules and, in particular, the plurality rule and Condorcet-consistent voting rules satisfy the simple-majority decisiveness property. The problem implied by such decisiveness, namely, the universal disregard of the preferences of the minority, can be ameliorated by applying unbiased scoring rules such as the classical Borda rule, but such amelioration has a price; it implies erosion in the implementation of the widely accepted ‘majority principle’. Furthermore, the problems of majority decisiveness and of the erosion in the majority principle are not necessarily severe when one takes into account the likelihood of their occurrence. This paper focuses on the evaluation of the severity of the two problems, comparing simple-majoritarian voting rules that allow the decisiveness of the smallest majority larger than ½ and the classical Borda method of counts. Our analysis culminates in the derivation of the conditions that determine, in terms of the number of alternatives k, the number of voters n and the relative (subjective) weight assigned to the severity of the two problems, which of these rules is superior in light of the dual majoritarian approacht.

Keywords: Majority decisiveness; Condorcet criterion; erosion of majority principle; the Borda method of counts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www2.biu.ac.il/soc/ec/wp/2010-07.pdf Working paper (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Condorcet vs. Borda in light of a dual majoritarian approach (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:biu:wpaper:2010-07

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Department of Economics ().