Economics at your fingertips  

The Revolving Door: State Connections and Inequality of Influence in the US Banking Sector

Elise Brezis ()

No 2017-09, Working Papers from Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper addresses the effects of the revolving door phenomenon on the inequality of influence among firms. It shows that firms are not equal in their capacities to benefit from state connections. We first develop a theoretical model introducing the notion of ‘bureaucratic capital’ and showing how the revolving door generates inequality in bureaucratic capital and in profits leading to inequality of influence. Then, this prediction is tested on a new database tracking the revolving door process involving the 20 biggest US commercial banks. We show that regulators who have created a large stock of ‘bureaucratic capital’ are more likely to be hired by the top five banks after leaving public office. We then develop indices of the inequality of influence between banks. We show that banks in the top revenue quintile concentrate around 80% of the stock of revolvers. Goldman Sachs appears as the prime beneficiary of this process, by concentrating almost 30% of the revolving door phenomenon.

Keywords: regulators; revolving door; rent-seeking; state connections; bureaucratic capital; inequality of influence; connected firms; corruption; unethical behavior. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D73 G01 G18 L51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban
Date: 2017-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Working paper (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Department of Economics ().

Page updated 2019-03-17
Handle: RePEc:biu:wpaper:2017-09