China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: A Range-Adjusted Measure based analysis

Ke Wang, Bin Lu and Yi-Ming Wei

No 61, CEEP-BIT Working Papers from Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology

Abstract: Energy and environmental efficiency evaluation has recently attracted increasing interest in China. In this study, we utilize the Range-Adjusted Measure (RAM) based nonparametric approach to evaluate the regional energy and environmental efficiency of China over the period of 2006-2010. The desirable/good and undesirable/bad outputs, as well as the energy and non-energy inputs are considered in the efficiency evaluation so as to characterize the energy consumption, economic production, and CO2 emission process of different China's regions. In addition, the economic concepts of natural disposability and managerial disposability are incorporated in the evaluation instead of the strong and weak disposability in conventional environmental efficiency evaluation. Therefore, the types of returns to scale and damages to scale of different China's regions are measured and correspondingly the strategy and policy implications are proposed for guiding the future improvement of regional energy and environmental efficiency. This study finds that: i) Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong had the highest integrated energy and environmental efficiency during the study period, which could be seen as the benchmarks of inefficient China's regions. ii) On average, east China had the highest integrated efficiency under natural disposability, and west China had the highest integrated efficiency under managerial disposability. iii) During 2006-2010, the average production efficiency of China slightly decreased and the average emission efficiency of China slightly increased. v) Among China's 30 regions, 19 regions exhibited decreasing returns to scale, 4 regions shown increasing returns to scale, and 7 regions have mixed returns to scale types under natural disposability in our study period. In addition, under managerial disposability, there are 18, 3 and 9 regions respectively exhibited increasing, decreasing and mixed damages to scale types over time. v) For most Chinese regions, it is not recommended to simply increase or maintain their current scales of production, but alternatively, they should pay more attentions on technology innovation of energy utilization efficiency improvement, since up to 2010, China still had large energy conservation and emission reduction potentials.

Keywords: Energy and environmental efficiency; Range-Adjusted Measure (RAM); Returns to scale; Damages to scale (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q40 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2014-07-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ceep.bit.edu.cn/docs/2018-10/20181011140938888822.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://ceep.bit.edu.cn/docs/2018-10/20181011140938888822.pdf [302 Found]--> https://ceep.bit.edu.cn/docs/2018-10/20181011140938888822.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A Range-Adjusted Measure based analysis (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:biw:wpaper:61

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEEP-BIT Working Papers from Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Zhi-Fu Mi ().