Evaluation 1 of "Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance: A survey of expert opinion"

Evaluator 1

No 2025-27, The Unjournal Evaluations from The Unjournal

Abstract: This insightful and policy-relevant paper brings empirical grounding to AGI safety measures by assessing expert consensus. It finds broad support for nearly all proposed safety practices across AGI labs, governments, and civil society. Key limitations [of the paper] include potential sampling bias " particularly over-representation of safety-minded respondents " and the challenge of interpreting abstract agreement as indicative of real-world implementation.

Date: 2025-05-27
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in The Unjournal

Downloads: (external link)
https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/e1agisafety (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjn:evalua:e1agisafety

DOI: 10.21428/d28e8e57.9b0d8cda/e2f9a7d7

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in The Unjournal Evaluations from The Unjournal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Davit Jintcharadze ().