Why do firms pay for liquidity provision in limit order markets?
Johannes Skjeltorp and
No 2010/12, Working Paper from Norges Bank
In recent years, a number of electronic limit order markets have reintroduced market makers for some securities (Designated Market Makers). This trend has mainly been initiated by financial intermediaries and listed firms themselves, without any regulatory pressure. In this paper we ask why firms are willing to pay to improve the secondary market liquidity of their shares. We show that a contributing factor in this decision is the likelihood that the firm will interact with the capital markets in the near future, either because they have capital needs, or that they are planning to repurchase shares. We also find some evidence of agency costs associated with the initiation of a market maker agreement as the probability of observing insider trades increases when liquidity improves.
Keywords: Market liquidity; Corporate Finance; Designated Market Makers; Insider trading (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G10 G20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec and nep-mst
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.norges-bank.no/en/news-events/news-pub ... pers/2010/WP-201012/
Working Paper: Why do firms pay for liquidity provision in limit order markets? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bno:worpap:2010_12
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Norges Bank Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().