Social Security Reform: Marginal or Fundamental Change?
Joseph Quinn ()
No 362, Boston College Working Papers in Economics from Boston College Department of Economics
Although officially off the table during the recent Presidential campaign, Social Security finances are very much in the news these days. Any discussion of Federal budget balance raises the topic, because Social Security expenditures are the largest item in the Federal budget. This paper discusses the size and timing of the Social Security funding problem, and asks whether there is a Social Security crisis and whether Social Security can be rescued without radical reform. The options proposed by the President's Social Security Advisory Board are then reviewed, followed by a discussion of some pros and cons of partial privatization, the most controversial component of the reform plans. Keywords: Social Security
JEL-codes: H3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published, Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC, 1997, 44-53
Downloads: (external link)
http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-P/wp362.pdf main text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocoec:362
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Boston College Working Papers in Economics from Boston College Department of Economics Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().