A Lot of Ambiguity
Zvi Safra and
Additional contact information
Zvi Safra: Warwick Business School
No 954, Boston College Working Papers in Economics from Boston College Department of Economics
We consider a risk averse decision maker who dislikes ambiguity as in the Ellsberg urns and compare the certainty equivalent of this gamble with the certainty equivalent of the anchoring probabilistic lottery. We deal first with the Choquet EU model and show that un- der some conditions on the capacity nu, when independent ambiguous gambles are repeated and the expected value of the anchoring lot- tery is zero, the difference between the average ambiguous and risky certainty equivalents converges to zero. When the parallel expected value is positive, we show that if the average certainty equivalent of the risky lottery is non-negative, then so is the limit of the average value for the ambiguous model. These results do not extend to the maxmin model or to the smooth recursive model.
Keywords: Ellsberg urns; repeated ambiguity; repeated risk; Choquet expected utility; maxmin (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-06-15, Revised 2020-03-31
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-knm and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-P/wp954.pdf main text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocoec:954
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Boston College Working Papers in Economics from Boston College Department of Economics Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().