The consequences of misspecifying the random-effects distribution when fitting generalized linear mixed models
John Neuhaus ()
Additional contact information
John Neuhaus: University of California-San Francisco
Fall North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2008 from Stata Users Group
Generalized linear mixed models provide effective analyses of clustered and longitudinal data and typically require the specification of the distribution of the random effects. The consequences of misspecifying this distribution are subject to debate; some authors suggest that large biases can arise, while others show that there will typically be little bias for the parameters of interest. Using analytic results, simulation studies, and example data, I summarize the results of extensive assessments of the bias in parameter estimates due to random-effects distribution misspecification. I also present assessments of the accuracy of random-effects predictions under misspecification. These assessments indicate that random-effects distribution misspecification often produces little bias when estimating slope coefficients but may yield biased intercepts and variance-components estimators as well as mildly inaccurate predicted random effects.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.org/fnasug2008/Neuhaus_Stata2008.pdf presentation slides (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:fsug08:19
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Fall North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2008 from Stata Users Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F Baum ().