Beyond hazard ratios: Method-specific reporting for reproducible competing-risk prediction in Stata

Aisha Vayani and Mark Rutherford
Additional contact information
Aisha Vayani: University of Leicester
Mark Rutherford: University of Leicester

UK Stata Conference 2026 from Stata Users Group

Abstract: Reporting guidance for prediction models increasingly emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and external validation. However, competing-risk prognostic models pose specific challenges for reporting absolute risk. Patient-level cumulative incidence predictions cannot usually be reproduced from coefficients or hazard ratios alone; they also depend on event definitions, competing-event coding, covariate transformations, baseline functions, prediction horizons, postestimation routines, and software implementation details. We aim to develop practical, method-specific recommendations for reporting competing-risk prognostic prediction models, focusing on what authors should provide so that another analyst can reproduce predicted cumulative incidence in software such as Stata.

Date: 2026-09-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:lsug26:08

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in UK Stata Conference 2026 from Stata Users Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().