Analyzing and comparing the impact of alternative concepts of resources in distributional studies: Greece, 2004/5
Theo Mitrakos () and
No 111, Working Papers from Bank of Greece
The usual practice in empirical distributional studies is to use either disposable income or consumption expenditure as a proxy for welfare. Essentially, both variables are used as approximations of the unobserved “permanent income” of the population members. This paper exploits the information in the Greek Household Budget Survey of 2004/5 and constructs an indicator of “permanent income” using a latent variable approach. The distributions of disposable income, consumption expenditure and permanent income are compared regarding their level and structure of inequality and poverty. Both inequality and poverty appear to be substantially lower using the distribution of permanent income instead of either the distribution of disposable income or the distribution of consumption expenditure, while differences are also evident when decomposition analysis of inequality and poverty is employed using appropriate indices.
Keywords: permanent income; inequality; poverty; welfare level (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bankofgreece.gr/BogEkdoseis/Paper2010111.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bog:wpaper:111
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Bank of Greece Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christina Tsochatzi ().