Are Coarse Ratings Fine? Applications to Crashworthiness Ratings

Siqi Liu (), Bhoomija Ranjan () and Benjamin Shiller
Additional contact information
Siqi Liu: Brandeis University
Bhoomija Ranjan: Monash Univeristy

No 132, Working Papers from Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School

Abstract: Many rating organizations intentionally coarsen ratings before public presentation, for example by using a discrete badge rather than a continuous rating. We investigate the impact of coarsening empirically in the context of automobile crashworthiness ratings. Specifically, we construct a univariate continuous crashworthiness rating from crash test measurements and observed fatality rates. We then estimate a random coeficient model of vehicle demand under status quo coarse ratings and simulate outcomes under counterfactual continuous ratings. We find that consumers alter vehicle choices, thereby reducing fatalities by 7.4%, which implies 1,850 fewer U.S. fatalities annually. Finally, we explore whether incentives to produce crashworthy vehicles are reduced enough to offset benefits of finer information. We conclude that a continuous rating format would reduce fatalities.

Pages: 55 pages
Date: 2020-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.brandeis.edu/economics/RePEc/brd/doc/Brandeis_WP132.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:brd:wpaper:132

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andrea Luna ().