Development Priorities: The Relative Benefits of Agricultural Growth
Mathan Satchi and
Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK
Should agriculture or non-agriculture be a priority for development? We revisit this longstanding and intractable question using a two-sector, three-factor dynamic model with an asymptotic balanced growth path. The model allows a forward-looking assessment of development priorities based on lifetime welfare. A comparison of sector-specific productivity gains indicates that gains in non-agriculture are often more valuable, even when agriculture is initially the largest sector in terms of employment. We discuss the robustness of this result, including the roles of capital intensity, the discount rate, and taxes on profits in influencing the rates of investment and structural transformation
Keywords: Structural transformation; agriculture; development policies; investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gro
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/efm/media/workingpapers/w ... pdffiles/dp19716.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bri:uobdis:19/716
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ben Auld ().