Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock

Christoph Koenig and David Schindler

Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK

Abstract: Do firearm purchase delay laws reduce aggregate homicide levels? Using variation from a 6-month countrywide gun demand shock in 2012/2013, we show that U.S. states with legislation preventing immediate handgun purchases experienced smaller increases in handgun sales. Our findings indicate that this is likely driven by comparatively lower purchases among impulsive consumers. We then demonstrate that states with purchase delays also witnessed comparatively 2% lower homicide rates during the same period. Further evidence shows that lower handgun sales coincided primarily with fewer impulsive assaults and points towards reduced acts of domestic violence.

Date: 2020-10-23
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/efm/media/workingpapers/w ... pdffiles/dp20730.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership, and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock (2023)
Working Paper: Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership, and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock (2019)
Working Paper: Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock (2018)
Working Paper: Impulse Purchases, Gun Ownership and Homicides: Evidence from a Firearm Demand Shock (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bri:uobdis:20/730

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vicky Jackson ().