Call Me Rutherford: Names and the Intergenerational Transmission of Political Preferences Over the Long Run*

Davide M. Coluccia

Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK

Abstract: We document that the names of newly elected politicians become more popular following their election. Their prevalence is correlated with county-level voting and with individual level political behavior. We apply this insight to measure the political preferences of 18 million US census records and examine their intergenerational transmission from 1830 to 1940. Family and political environment account for comparable shares of variation in individual political preferences. Intergenerational persistence is 45% weaker when parental political views conflict with local political conditions. Transmission varies over time: political preferences were more mobile in the nineteenth century and became considerably more persistent between 1900 and 1940. Transmission displays similarly large spatial variation and is non-monotonic in electoral competition. These findings document how environmental factors influence the transmission of political identity across generations.

Date: 2026
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-his and nep-pol
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/efm/media/workingpapers/w ... pdffiles/dp26832.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bri:uobdis:26/832

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK
Bibliographic data for series maintained by School of Economics Research Support Team ().