Canadian Evidence on Long-Run Neutrality Propositions
Zisimos Koustas ()
Working Papers from Brock University, Department of Economics
The empirical methodology developed by King and Watson (1992) is employed to test the validity of a number of long-run neutrality propositions in the Canadian context. We test for long-run money neutrality, the vertical long-run Phillips curve, and the long-run Fisher relationship using quarterly post WWII data for the Canadian economy.
Keywords: MONETARY; POLICY (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E40 E50 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: Canadian Evidence on Long-Run Neutrality Propositions (1998)
Working Paper: Canadian Evidence on Long-Run Neutrality Propositions (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:brk:wpaper:1996-04
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Brock University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Francois Lamarche ().