Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system
Randall Reback () and
Julie Cullen
No 601, Working Papers from Barnard College, Department of Economics
Abstract:
We explore the extent to which schools manipulate the composition of students in the test-taking pool in order to maximize ratings under Texas' accountability system in the 1990s. We first derive predictions from a static model of administrators' incentives given the structure of the ratings criteria, and then test these predictions by comparing differential changes in exemption rates across student subgroups within campuses and across campuses and regimes. Our analyses uncover evidence of a moderate degree of strategic behavior, so that there is some tension between designing systems that account for heterogeneity in student populations and that are manipulation-free.
Keywords: school accountability; performance standard; caseload manipulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 H39 I28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46 pages
Date: 2006-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-pbe and nep-ure
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.barnard.columbia.edu/working_papers/wp0601.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.econ.barnard.columbia.edu:80 (No such host is known. )
Related works:
Working Paper: Tinkering Toward Accolades: School Gaming Under a Performance Accountability System (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:brn:wpaper:0601
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Barnard College, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Robert O'Connor ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).