An Investigation of Editorial Favoritism in the AER
Philip Coelho () and
No 201203, Working Papers from Ball State University, Department of Economics
This paper adds to the literature on the credibility of academic research by examining the hypothesis that the selection procedures of academic journals in economics favor submissions that frequently cite editorial insiders. We use procedures, a sample size, and methods that offset some of the limitations that accompanied previous investigations. Using the expanded sample and controls we find that citations to insiders in articles in the American Economic Review increased the frequency of citations in non-AER journals. The evidence is robust; our findings contradict those in previous research. Given our metric, sample, and procedures, we find no significant support for the hypothesis of editorial favoritism.
JEL-codes: A10 A14 B40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2012-08, Revised 2012-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://econfac.bsu.edu/research/workingpapers/bsuecwp201203coelho.pdf First version, 2012 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: An Investigation of Editorial Favoritism in the AER (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bsu:wpaper:201203
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Ball State University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tung Liu ().