Was the Mandal Commission Right? Living Standard Differences between Backward Classes and Other Social Groups in India

Ira Gang, Kunal Sen and Myeong-Su Yun ()

Global Development Institute Working Paper Series from GDI, The University of Manchester

Abstract: Affirmative action has been at the heart of public policies towards the socially disadvantaged in India. Compensatory discrimination policies which have been adopted for the Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) since independence were recommended for Other Backward Classes (OBC) by the Mandal Commission established by the Indian government in 1979. We examine why OBC have lower living standards, as measured by per capita household consumption expenditures, relative to the mainstream population, and whether these reasons are similar to those observed for SC and ST. We find that while the causes of the living standard gap for the OBC are broadly similar to those for the SC and ST, the role of educational attainment in explaining the gap is higher in importance for the OBC.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/gdi/pu ... wpi/bwpi-wp-4108.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Was the Mandal Commission Right? Living Standard Differences between Backward Classes and Other Social Groups in India (2008)
Working Paper: Was the Mandal Commission Right? Living Standard Differences between Backward Classes and Other Social Groups in India (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bwp:bwppap:4108

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Global Development Institute Working Paper Series from GDI, The University of Manchester Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rowena Harding ().