When Can School Inputs Improve Test Scores?

Jishnu Das, Stefan Dercon, James Habyarimana and Pramila Krishnan

Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge

Abstract: Most studies fail to find an impact of school inputs on outcomes such as test scores. We argue that this might be a consequence of ignoring the possibility that households respond optimally to changes in school inputs and thus obscure the real effect of such provision. To incorporate the forward-looking behaviour of households, we present a household optimisation model relating household resources and cognitive achievement to school inputs. In this framework if household and school inputs are technical substitutes in the production function, the impact of unanticipated inputs is larger than that of anticipated inputs. We test the predictions of the model for non-salary cash grants to schools using a unique data set from Zambia. Consistent with the optimisation model, anticipated funds lead to significant improvements in learning. We are thus able both to order the effects of different kinds of spending and capture their impact on cognitive achievement.

Pages: 60
Date: 2004-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-ure
Note: DE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://files.econ.cam.ac.uk/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe0437.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: When Can School Inputs Improve Test Scores? (2004)
Working Paper: When can school inputs improve test scores? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cam:camdae:0437

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake Dyer (jd419@cam.ac.uk).