‘Unfair’ Discrimination in Two-sided Peering? Evidence from LINX

Alessio D’Ignazio and Emanuele Giovannetti
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Alessio D'Ignazio

Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge

Abstract: Does asymmetry between Internet Providers affect the “fairness” of their interconnection contracts? While recent game theoretic literature provides contrasting answers to this question, there is a lack of empirical research. We introduce a novel dataset on micro-interconnection policies and provide an econometric analysis of the determinants of peering decisions amongst the Internet Service Providers interconnecting at the London Internet Exchange Point (LINX). Our key result shows that two different metrics, introduced to capture asymmetry, exert opposite effects. Asymmetry in “market size” enhances the quality of the link, while asymmetry in “network centrality” induces quality degradation, hence “unfairer” interconnection conditions.

Keywords: Internet Peering; Two-sided Markets; Network Industries; Antitrust (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C81 L14 L40 L86 L96 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23
Date: 2006-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-mic and nep-net
Note: IO
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://files.econ.cam.ac.uk/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe0621.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cam:camdae:0621

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake Dyer ().