Incentive Regulation of Electricity Distribution Networks: Lessons of Experience from Britain
Tooraj Jamasb () and
Michael Pollitt ()
Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
This paper reviews the recent experience of the UK electricity distribution sector under incentive regulation. The UK has a significant and transparent history in implementing incentive regulation in the period since 1990. We demonstrate the successes of this period in reducing costs, prices and energy losses while maintaining quality of service. We also draw out the lessons for other countries in implementing distribution sector reform. We conclude by discussing the place of incentive regulation of networks within the wider reform context, the required legislative framework, the need for appropriate unbundling, the importance of quality of service incentives, the regulatory information requirements and the role of sector rationalisation.
Keywords: Electricity; liberalisation; regulation; benchmarking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L52 L94 Q48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec, nep-ene, nep-his and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (75) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: Lessons of experience from Britain (2007)
Working Paper: Incentive Regulation of Electricity Distribution Networks: Lessons of Experience from Britain (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cam:camdae:0709
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake Dyer (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .