Economics at your fingertips  

Do consumption-based asset pricing models explain own-history predictability in stock market returns?

Michael Ashby and Oliver B. Linton

Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge

Abstract: We show that three prominent consumption-based asset pricing models - the Bansal-Yaron, Campbell-Cochrane and Cecchetti-Lam-Mark models - cannot explain the own-history predictability properties of stock market returns. We show this by estimating these models with GMM, deriving ex-ante expected returns from them and then testing whether the difference between realised and expected returns is a martingale difference sequence, which it is not. Furthermore, semi-parametric tests of whether the models' state variables are consistent with the degree of own-history predictability in stock returns suggest that only the Campbell-Cochrane habit variable may be able to explain return predictability, although the evidence on this is mixed.

Keywords: consumption-based asset pricing models; martingale difference sequence; MIDAS; power spectrum; predictability; quantilogram; rescaled range; serial correlation; variance ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C52 C58 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-10-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fmk
Note: obl20, mwa22
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake Dyer ().

Page updated 2023-01-24
Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2259