Auditing the Auditors: An evaluation of the REF2021 Output Results
Oliver B. Linton and
Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
We apply the Hole algorithm to evaluate the REF2021 output quality exercise. We find that the implied journal ranking agrees quite closely with the ABS-SCOB journal ranking, and in particular the GPAâ€™s agree with a 91% correlation.
Keywords: Journal quality; Ranking; Research funding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cam:camdae:2266
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cambridge Working Papers in Economics from Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake Dyer ().