Large Firms and the Cyclicality of US Labour Productivity
Joshua Brault () and
Hashmat Khan ()
Additional contact information
Joshua Brault: Department of Economics, Carleton University, https://carleton.ca/economics/people/brault-joshua/
Hashmat Khan: Department of Economics, Carleton University, https://carleton.ca/economics/people/khan-hashmat-u/
No 21-02, Carleton Economic Papers from Carleton University, Department of Economics
We present novel stylized facts on the cyclicality of labour productivity for large and small firms and contrast them with those at the aggregate level. We find that the large- firm output-labour productivity correlation declines by nearly 0.5 from the pre-1985 to post-1985 period, closely resembling the decline of 0.6 in the aggregate annual data. The lead-lag correlation pattern is also similar to that in the aggregate data. We do not find patterns consistent with these facts for small firms. Our findings are of direct relevance to the growing literature on the role of large firms in driving US business cycles.
Keywords: Large Firms; Labour Productivity; Business Cycles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D22 E24 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-eff and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published: Carleton Economics Papers
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:car:carecp:21-02
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Carleton Economic Papers from Carleton University, Department of Economics C870 Loeb Building, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa Ontario, K1S 5B6 Canada.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sabrina Robineau ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).