Implementing Income Verification in Australia
Yogi Vidyattama,
Robert Tanton (),
Alan Duncan and
Ross Gayler ()
Additional contact information
Ross Gayler: Scoring Solutions, Veda Advantage
No 13/20, NATSEM Working Paper Series from University of Canberra, National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling
Abstract:
The recent credit crunch and global recession has forced Governments to consider implementing compulsory income verification for loan applicants. This paper analyses the different methods used in UK and US for income verification and highlights the issues in implementing each method. Finally, each of the methods is assessed in looking at applying a method in Australia. The paper concludes that a modelling approach to income verification will work for the most people
Keywords: Financial Institution; Government Regulation; Income Verification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D14 G31 G32 G38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 2013-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published as a NATSEM Working Paper series
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/files/download?id=1123 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.natsem.canberra.edu.au:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cba:wpaper:wp1120
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NATSEM Working Paper Series from University of Canberra, National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Trueman ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).