Usage Patterns and Costs of Unmanned Aerial Systems

Congressional Budget Office

No 57090, Reports from Congressional Budget Office

Abstract: For the past two decades, the Department of Defense has been selectively using unmanned aerial systems (UASs) in place of manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft, flying them for much longer durations, on average. UASs generally have lower recurring costs per flying hour than manned aircraft. However, comparing the life-cycle costs (including acquisition costs) per flying hour of the Air Force’s unmanned RQ-4 and the Navy’s manned P-8, CBO found that UASs’ cost advantage may not be as large when the costs of acquiring the aircraft are considered.

JEL-codes: H41 H43 H56 H57 L64 N42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-06-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2021-06/57090-UAS.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbo:report:57090

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Reports from Congressional Budget Office Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().