Shareholder value maximisation, stock market and new technology: should the US corporate model be the universal standard
Rafael De Hoyos (),
Alaka Singh and
Working Papers from Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
In 1992 a blue-ribbon group of US economists led by Michael Porter concluded that the US stock market-based corporate model was misallocating resources and jeopardising US competitiveness. The faster growth of US economy since then and the supposed US lead in the spread of information technology has brought new legitimacy to the stock market and the corporate model, which is being hailed as the universal standard. Two main conclusions of the analysis presented here are: (a) there is no warrant for revising the blue-ribbon groupÕs conclusion; and (b) even US corporations let alone developing country ones would be better off not having stock market valuation as a corporate goal.
Keywords: Shareholder wealth; Information technology; Stock-market efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G1 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cfn, nep-fin and nep-fmk
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/ce ... ing-papers/wp315.pdf (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Shareholder Value Maximisation, Stock Market and New Technology: Should the US Corporate Model be the Universal Standard? (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp315
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ruth Newman and Georgie Cohen ().