Shareholder Protection around the World ("Leximetric II")
Mathias Siems
Working Papers from Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Abstract:
This article analyzes how shareholder protection has developed in 20 countries from 1995 to 2005. In contrast to traditional legal research, it draws on a quanti-tative methodology to law ("leximetrics", "numerical comparative law"). Some of its results are that in most countries shareholder protection has improved in the last years; that developed countries perform better than developing countries in protecting shareholders; that shareholder protection in common law countries is relatively similar whereas there is no comparable similarity within the Ger-man and French civil law families; that German corporate law is "more main-stream" and US corporate law is "more eccentric" than the law of the other countries; and that in general there has been convergence in the last decade. In order to explain these results, the distinction between origin and transplant countries can be useful. However, in contrast to previous studies, this does not mean that all depends on the distinction between English, French and German origin and transplant countries. Rather it is decisive (a) which "version" of the corporate law the transplant country copied, (b) whether transplant countries continue to take developments in the origin countries into account and (c) whether transplant countries have left the path of their (former) origin countries.
Keywords: Shareholder protection; leximetrics; numerical comparative law; law and fi-nance; La Porta et al.; LLSV; comparative company law; comparative corporate law; comparative corporate governance; legal origins; legal families; legal transplants; legal development; convergence; civil law; common law. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G00 G30 G38 K00 K22 N20 N40 P50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-12
Note: PRO-2
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cbrwp359.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp359
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ruth Newman ().