Does it Pay to Work for Free? Negative Selection and the Wage Returns to Volunteer Experience
Guido Cozzi (),
Noemi Mantovan () and
Robert Sauer ()
No 32, CHILD Working Papers Series from Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA
This paper offers the first instrumental variables estimates of the wage returns to volunteer experience. The returns are substantial and differ considerably by gender. The results imply that the unequal valuation of volunteer experience by gender is more important in explaining the gender earnings gap than is the unequal valuation of part-time paid work experience. The results also indicate negative selection into unpaid work. In a simple model of optimal volunteering, negative selection implies that a lower cost of volunteering would produce both an expanded and higher-skilled pool of volunteers, and greater societal benefits from volunteer work.
Keywords: Volunteering; Unpaid Work; Gender Differences; Instrumental Variables; Rainfall; Negative Selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C26 D64 H41 J16 J31 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hrm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Does it Pay to Work for Free? Negative Selection and the Wage Returns to Volunteer Experience (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cca:wchild:32
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CHILD Working Papers Series from Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Giovanni Bert ().