An Efficiency Comparison of Means Testing Tools: Money Metric or Counting Approach?
Federico Perali and
Eva Sierminska ()
No 57 JEL Classification: D13, H31, I32, O15., CHILD Working Papers Series from Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA
As part of the Europe 2020 strategy, European member states have committed to modernize and harmonize their welfare systems and to improve the quality of the means testing tools adopted to correctly identify the beneficiaries of welfare policies. This study contributes to the literature on means testing by implementing and comparing two alternative multidimensional targeting approaches: a money metric and a counting measurement of poverty. The two approaches aggregate poverty dimensions and implement inter-household comparisons of wellbeing differently. The study shows that in terms of targeting efficiency the approach based on the money metric is superior. The comparison is relevant both from an empirical and a policy point of view because a unified means testing tool would pave the road towards harmonized welfare policies across European countries.
Keywords: Means testing; multidimensional poverty; asset-based poverty; wellbeing. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cca:wchild:57
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CHILD Working Papers Series from Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Giovanni Bert ().