Why Should Rational Smokers Find it Hard to Quit? Introducing Uncertainty into the Rational Addiction Model
Audrey Laporte and
No 170004, Working Papers from Canadian Centre for Health Economics
One problem with the Becker-Murphy model of Rational Addiction, at least in the eyes of many public health specialists, is that it does not explain why so many rational, forward looking, smokers should apparently find it so hard to quit, especially since the terminal conditions are part of an intertemporal optimization problem. In this paper we apply techniques of stochastic control theory to introduce uncertainty into the individualâ€™s perception of how her stock of addiction will accumulate over time as a consequence of her time path of smoking. We assume that addiction capital is basically unobservable, so she cannot adjust her smoking behaviour according to a feedback policy rule but instead builds uncertainty into her consumption plan from the beginning. We discuss the differences between the equation explaining her lifetime smoking trajectory in the deterministic and stochastic cases, and find that the quadratic utility function which underlies the familiar lead-lag consumption form of rational addiction equation is not, in fact, capable of allowing for the type of uncertainty which we consider here.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea and nep-upt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Published Online, June 2017
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.canadiancentreforhealtheconomics.ca/wp ... /LaporteFerguson.pdf First version, 2017 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cch:wpaper:170004
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Canadian Centre for Health Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Adrian Rohit Dass ().