Tacit versus Overt Collusion Firm Asymmetries and Numbers: What’s the Evidence?

Stephen Davies () and Matt Olczak ()
Additional contact information
Stephen Davies: Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

No 08-32, Working Papers from Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

Abstract: It is conventional wisdom that collusion is more likely the fewer firms there are in a market and the more symmetric they are. This is often theoretically justified in terms of a repeated non-cooperative game. Although that model fits more easily with tacit than overt collusion, the impression sometimes given is that ‘one model fits all’. Moreover, the empirical literature offers few stylised facts on the most simple of questions – how few are few and how symmetric is symmetric? This paper attempts to fill this gap while also exploring the interface of tacit and overt collusion, albeit in an indirect way. First, it identifies the empirical model of tacit collusion that the European Commission appears to have employed in coordinated effects merger cases – apparently only fairly symmetric duopolies fit the bill. Second, it shows that, intriguingly, the same story emerges from the quite different experimental literature on tacit collusion. This offers a stark contrast with the findings for a sample of prosecuted cartels; on average, these involve six members (often more) and size asymmetries among members are often considerable. The indirect nature of this ‘evidence’ cautions against definitive conclusions; nevertheless, the contrast offers little comfort for those who believe that the same model does, more or less, fit all.

Keywords: tacit collusion; collective dominance; coordinated effects; cartels; European mergers; asymmetries; firm numbers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L13 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
Date: 2008-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-com and nep-ind
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-32.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-32

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cheryl Whittkaer ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).