TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS OR COLORED NOISE? WHY REAL-BUSINESS-CYCLE MODELS CANNOT EXPLAIN ACTUAL BUSINESS CYCLES

Kevin Salyer () and Kevin Hoover ()

No 162, Working Papers from University of California, Davis, Department of Economics

Abstract: Typically real-business-cycle models are assessed by their ability to mimic the covariances and variances of actual business cycle data. Recently, however, advocates of RBC models have used them to fit the historical path of real GDP using the Solow residual as a driving process. We demonstrate that the success of RBC models at matching historical GDP data does not confirm the validity of RBC models. Through simulations we demonstrate that the Solow residual does not carry useful information about technology shocks and that the RBC model does not add incremental information about GDP. RBC models fit historical GDP data entirely because the Solow residual is itself just a noisy measure of GDP.

Date: 2003-01-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.dss.ucdavis.edu/files/2RajTjkGZ65PQuaqUcdU6UTg/97-29.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Technology Shocks or Coloured Noise? Why real-business-cycle models cannot explain actual business cycles (1998)
Working Paper: TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS OR COLORED NOISE? WHY REAL-BUSINESS-CYCLE MODELS CANNOT EXPLAIN ACTUAL BUSINESS CYCLES
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cda:wpaper:162

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of California, Davis, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Letters and Science IT Services Unit ().