A Search-Theoretic Model of the Term Premium
Kevin Salyer (),
Athanasios Geromichalos and
Lucas Herrenbrueck
No 300, Working Papers from University of California, Davis, Department of Economics
Abstract:
A consistent empirical feature of bond yields is that term premia are, on average, positive. That is, investors in long term bonds receive higher returns than investors in similar (i.e.\ same default risk) shorter maturity bonds over the same holding period. The majority of theoretical explanations for this observation have viewed the term premia through the lens of the consumption based capital asset pricing model. In contrast, we harken to an older empirical literature which attributes the term premium to the idea that short maturity bonds are inherently more liquid. The goal of this paper is to provide a theoretical justification of this concept. To that end, we employ a model in the tradition of modern monetary theory extended to include assets of different maturities. Short term assets always mature in time to take advantage of random consumption opportunities. Long term assets do not, but agents may liquidate them in a secondary asset market, characterized by search-and-bargaining frictions a la Duffie, Garleanu, and Pedersen (2005). In equilibrium, long term assets have higher rates of return to compensate agents for their relative lack of liquidity. Consistent with empirical findings, our model predicts a steeper yield curve for assets that trade in less liquid secondary markets.
Keywords: monetary-search models; liquidity; over-the-counter markets; yield curve (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E31 E43 E52 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39
Date: 2013-06-13
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.dss.ucdavis.edu/files/GmJSdajD2iS7s49UHbD9FBTY/13-8.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: A search-theoretic model of the term premium (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cda:wpaper:300
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of California, Davis, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Letters and Science IT Services Unit ().