WAS ALEXANDER HAMILTON RIGHT? LIMIT-PRICING FOREIGN MONOPOLY AND INFANT-INDUSTRY PROTECTION
Aditya Bhattacharjea ()
No 55, Working papers from Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics
In 1791, Alexander Hamilton put forward an argument for infant-industry protection based on the need to overcome the entry-deterring behaviour of foreign monopolists. This paper recasts Hamilton's argument as a model of strategic trade policy under asymmetric information, and examines the credibility and time-consistency of such protection, and the intertemporal welfare trade-offs it involves. It finds that while Hamilton's prescription is valid for a particular case, it is not robust, and the optimal policy might instead involve a commitment not to protect the domestic industry.
Pages: 26 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cde:cdewps:55
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
The price is free.
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working papers from Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics Delhi 110 007. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sanjeev Sharma ().