Comparing different data descriptors in Indirect Inference tests on DSGE models
A. Patrick Minford,
Michael Wickens and
Yongdeng Xu
No E2016/5, Cardiff Economics Working Papers from Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section
Abstract:
Indirect inference testing can be carried out with a variety of auxiliary models. Asymptotically these different models make no difference. However, in small samples power can differ. We explore small sample power with three different auxiliary models: a VAR, average Impulse Response Functions and Moments. The latter corresponds to the Simulated Moments Method. We find that in a small macro model there is no difference in power. But in a large complex macro model the power with Moments rises more slowly with increasing misspecification than with the other two which remain similar.
Keywords: : Indirect Inference; DGSE model; Auxiliary Models; Simulated Moments Method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 C32 C52 E1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 11 pages
Date: 2016-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-ecm, nep-pr~ and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
http://carbsecon.com/wp/E2016_5.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Comparing different data descriptors in Indirect Inference tests on DSGE models (2017) 
Journal Article: Comparing different data descriptors in Indirect Inference tests on DSGE models (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2016/5
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cardiff Economics Working Papers from Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Yongdeng Xu ().