Unbalanced Books: How to Improve Toronto’s Fiscal Accountability
Benjamin Dachis () and
William Robson ()
Additional contact information
Colin Busby: C.D. Howe Institute
No 103, e-briefs from C.D. Howe Institute
As Toronto gears up for a municipal election this fall, the city's poor record on fiscal accountability promises to be a central issue. As the sixth largest government in Canada, with a budget of over $11 billion annually, Toronto city hall should have its finances under better control. A 10-year comparison of planned spending changes announced in budgets with actual results reported after year-end reveals large deviations between planned and actual spending that are routine. To increase transparency and accountability, Toronto should consolidate its now separate capital and operating budgets, move to a uniform accounting basis for its budgets and year-end results, and provide multi-year budgets. City government should adhere more closely to the budgets Council votes every year.
Keywords: Governance and Public Institutions; Toronto; fiscal accountability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E62 H72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 6 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac and nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Published on the C.D. Howe Institute website, August 2010
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cdhowe.org/unbalanced-books-how-improv ... iscal-accountability (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdh:ebrief:103
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in e-briefs from C.D. Howe Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kristine Gray ().