SDI: Two Views of Professional Responsibility

Danny Cohen and David Lorge Pamas

Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series from Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California

Abstract: A juxtaposition of two competing views regarding the development and implementation of SDI, the article takes its two positions from two separate sources. These opposing opinions are for either the implementation of SDI on defense grounds or the cancelling of SDI to prevent destabilitization.

Keywords: SDI; Nuclear deterrence; Nuclear proliferation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1987-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6bv8p2md.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:globco:qt6bv8p2md

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series from Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().